Business Consulting — 10-Phase IDEA → Business Plan Methodology
Engagement Phases
Intake
Fit-check and kickoff workshop. We confirm the idea is consultable (not an already-operating company with real data — that's what Agentic Transformation is for), schedule the 4 sprint weeks, and sign the brief with the founder. No commitment until the brief closes.
Sprint 1 · Business Plan
We execute the 10 playbook phases grouped in 5 clusters. Weekly sessions with the founder, 10+ customer interviews, quality gates between phases. On day 28 we deliver a 16-section business plan + GO/NO-GO recommendation for Sprint 2.
Sprint 2 · MVP Build (optional)
If Sprint 1 closes GO, it plugs directly into the MVP Development LOB: same team, same plan, no re-scope. We build the MVP defined in Phases 8-9 on top of the validated use cases. Price and timeline get locked in the MVP brief.
$8K USD · 4 weeks · fixed price · 50/50 payment
Description
Consulting — Business Plan Reference Architecture
A structured three-engagement lifecycle for pre-seed and seed sponsors. Intake assesses fit. Sprint 1 produces an investor-ready Business Plan through a 10-phase / 4-week execution. Sprint 2 (optional) extends delivery into an MVP build. The methodology is stage-gated: each engagement closes with an explicit GO / NO-GO recommendation so a CIO or CTO sponsor can evaluate continuation on evidence, not momentum.
Audience note. Most LOB pages describe what we deploy into your environment. Consulting is different — what we deploy is mostly into the deliverable. This document names both: the stack we run the engagement on (so you can evaluate our execution rigor), and the thin infrastructure surface that lands on your side (so you can plan what your team hosts during and after).
Design principles
1. Stage gates beat continuous engagement. Each phase cluster ends with an explicit gate — Model Approved at Week 2, MVP Scope Decision at Week 3, Delivery at Week 4. Continuation past each gate requires evidence, not enthusiasm. Sponsors de-commit at any gate without sunk-cost pressure.
2. Founder time is a finite resource; engineer around it. The engagement is sized to consume ~32 hours of sponsor / founder time across Sprint 1. Weeks 1–2 require the most participation (only the founder carries the product insight); Weeks 3–4 step back (we produce the packaging). This asymmetry is a deliberate resource-management decision.
3. Artifacts survive the engagement — and are machine-readable. The Business Plan is a document of record, not a slide deck. Editable financial workbook. Searchable interview transcripts. Versioned assumption log. When the founder adds a cofounder, hires a CFO, or executes Sprint 2, the deliverables are the on-ramp — not a PDF that has to be re-read.
4. Stack-neutral, industry-fluent. We do not route sponsors to preferred cloud vendors for the consulting engagement, and the Sprint 2 MVP brief names reference stacks rather than imposes one. Regulatory and market analysis defaults to your industry's standards — CNBV for fintech, COFEPRIS / NOM-024 for healthcare, IFT for telecom — not a generic template.
The stack behind the engagement
Before the phases — what we run on. Every tool below is named so a CIO can evaluate the supply chain: where the deliverable data lives, who has access, what happens to it at engagement close.
| Layer | Tools we run | Why / what the sponsor sees |
|---|---|---|
| Project vault | Obsidian + Git (markdown sources of truth) · Google Drive (sponsor-facing readonly mirror) | Every interview transcript, market source, and decision lands here. Vault is versioned; sponsor gets a full read-only export at close. |
| Interview capture | Zoom / Google Meet (with consent banner) · Otter.ai or Whisper API for transcription · PII-scrubbed before vault commit | 10–12 interviews produce ~80k words of transcript. Scrubbed versions enter the validation dossier; raw audio deleted at engagement close unless sponsor requests archival. |
| Market data | INEGI / Banxico / SE public datasets · DataMexico · industry reports under fair-use citation · LinkedIn Sales Navigator (competitor mapping only — no contact scraping) | Sources are cited in the Market Sizing Memo with retrieval date and license terms. |
| Financial modeling | Google Sheets (SaaS / marketplace / D2C template banks) or Excel if sponsor requires offline delivery | Assumptions are first-class cells — color-coded, never hard-coded into formulas. Sensitivity tables generate from a single driver block. |
| Business plan rendering | Markdown → Pandoc → PDF/DOCX · mermaid for embedded diagrams | The 16-section Business Plan is generated from source, not hand-typeset. Sponsor gets the markdown + the rendered output. Re-render is a one-command operation. |
| Sprint 2 brief handoff | MVP Scope Spec (markdown + ADR-lite structure) · OpenAPI stub if the MVP has a public API · Figma wireframe if the MVP has UX surface | The Scope Spec is what our MVP Development LOB builds against — no re-interpretation, no handoff loss. |
Data residency. Interview audio and untranscribed materials live in MX- or US-region storage depending on sponsor preference. Final deliverables (markdown, workbook, PDF, DOCX) are delivered as plain files — sponsor owns them outright; we retain an archival copy for 12 months under NDA then delete.
Access. Vault access is per-engagement: the analyst assigned to the engagement, the engagement lead (Growgy), and the CTO (Teky, only when scoping Sprint 2). Audit log of vault access is available to sponsor on request.
What lands in your environment
This is the section a CIO / CTO actually budgets against. During Sprint 1, almost nothing lands in your cloud. The full infra footprint is:
| Surface | What it is | Cost to sponsor | Operational burden |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sponsor's own calendar + email | 32 hours of meetings + async document review across 4 weeks | Time only | None |
| Read-write access to shared folder | One Google Drive or SharePoint folder, sponsor-owned, we write into | Free / existing M365 or Workspace seat | IT grants + revokes at close |
| Financial workbook copy | Google Sheet or Excel — sponsor-owned copy at delivery | Free | None |
| Optional: Sprint 2 infrastructure | See MVP Development LOB — Sprint 2 is where actual cloud / source-control / CI-CD lands on your side | MVP LOB pricing | Varies by MVP shape |
What we deliberately do NOT require during Sprint 1: no VPN, no SSO integration, no access to your internal data warehouse, no procurement of new SaaS, no installation of agents on sponsor endpoints. The engagement runs clean-room style against public data + interviews — which keeps your security review at one meeting, not six.
If Sprint 2 activates: the MVP lands on a real stack (AWS/GCP/Azure or OSS) — see the MVP Development LOB architecture document for that deployment model. The Sprint 2 brief names the reference stack; the sponsor's CIO approves it before Week 5 kickoff.
The three engagements
Phase 0 · Intake (Days 1–5 · Included)
Fit-check against the consulting methodology. Deliberately short: 3–5 days, no fee.
- Kickoff workshop with the sponsor (2 hours, remote)
- Confirmation that the problem is consulting-shaped: a new venture, market entry, or business line without a validated playbook. Already-operating companies seeking optimization or data-driven transformation route to the Agentic Transformation LOB instead.
- Tooling decision: Drive vs SharePoint folder, transcription stack, calendar owner.
- Sprint calendar lock (which calendar weeks the engagement will occupy).
- Brief signature — commits both parties to scope, calendar, and price for Sprint 1.
Sponsor time commitment: ~4 hours. Output: signed Sprint 1 brief + provisioned shared folder.
Phase 1 · Sprint 1 — Business Plan (Weeks 1–4 · $8,000 USD)
The core engagement. 10 execution phases grouped into 5 clusters across 4 calendar weeks. Sponsor time: ~32 hours across the 4 weeks, front-loaded into Weeks 1–2.
Discover (Days 1–7 · Phases 1–2)
Phase 1 — Kickoff & Discovery. Day 1, 2-hour workshop on Zoom or Meet. Extract the founder's insight, evidence, and constraints. We capture with Otter/Whisper and commit the scrubbed transcript to the vault. Deliverable: Founder's Brief (markdown) — single source of truth for the engagement.
Phase 2 — Validation Interviews. Days 2–7, analyst-led. 10–12 structured interviews with target customers (not personal network), each 30–45 min over video call, recorded with consent, transcribed, PII-scrubbed. Coded pain-pattern extraction (frequency, severity, existing workarounds) using a simple taxonomy committed alongside the transcripts. Deliverable: Validation Dossier (markdown + coded data) with continue / pivot / stop recommendation.
Close of Week 1: 6 cumulative deliverables · ~12 sponsor hours.
Model (Days 8–14 · Phases 3–5)
Phase 3 — Brand & Narrative. One-sentence, three-sentence, and thirty-second pitch. Deliverable: Brand Spine — positioning, tone, key phrases. Captured as markdown so Sprint 2 can reference it.
Phase 4 — Business Model Canvas. Osterwalder canvas built against validated inputs (not hypotheses). We use Miro or a markdown canvas format the sponsor prefers; both versions committed. Deliverable: v1 canvas with assumptions flagged.
Phase 5 — Revenue & Unit Economics. Pricing, COGS, CAC, LTV, break-even analysis. Built in Google Sheets (or Excel on request) with a single driver block — every assumption is a named, colored cell. Sensitivity tables generate from the driver block, not by hand. Deliverable: Unit Economics Sheet + signed-off canvas.
Week 2 gate — Model Approved. Sponsor reviews, signs, or redirects. Close of Week 2: 14 cumulative deliverables · ~8 sponsor hours.
Validate (Days 15–21 · Phases 6–7)
Phase 6 — Market Sizing & TAM. Bottom-up + top-down. Sources: INEGI, Banco de México, DataMexico, industry reports, competitor disclosures. Every figure is cited with retrieval date and license. Deliverable: Market Sizing Memo with TAM/SAM/SOM + defensible assumptions.
Phase 7 — Competitive Landscape. Direct, indirect, and potential competitors. Positioning map + whitespace analysis. We use LinkedIn Sales Navigator and public company data for competitor mapping only — no outreach, no scraping. Deliverable: Competitive Canvas.
Week 3 gate — MVP Scope Decision. GO / NO-GO on Sprint 2. Close of Week 3: 24 cumulative deliverables · ~6 sponsor hours.
Strategize (Days 22–24 · Phase 8)
Phase 8 — Go-to-Market & Ops Plan. Channel strategy, first-100-customer plan, ops model, hiring plan, vendor strategy, regulatory path if applicable. If MVP gate was GO, includes the MVP Scope Spec — the smallest buildable product that validates the riskiest assumption, written in markdown with an ADR-lite decision log so the MVP LOB doesn't re-litigate choices during Sprint 2. Deliverable: GTM Playbook + optional MVP Scope Spec.
Plan (Days 25–28 · Phases 9–10)
Phase 9 — Business Plan Draft & Financial Model. All prior deliverables integrated into a single 16-section Business Plan of record, generated from markdown via Pandoc to PDF/DOCX. Financial model cross-referenced and editable. Deliverable: v1 Business Plan + Financial Model Workbook.
Phase 10 — Final Delivery. Sponsor walkthrough, question round, final revisions. Hard copy, editable markdown sources, editable financial model, full vault export. No license retention, no lock-in, no watermarked PDFs. Deliverable: Final Business Plan · 33 deliverables cumulative.
Close of Week 4: 33 cumulative deliverables · ~6 sponsor hours · Sprint 1 complete.
Phase 2 · Sprint 2 — MVP Build (Weeks 5–8 · Optional · $8,000+ USD)
Activated only on Sprint 1 GO recommendation at the Week 3 gate. Direct handoff to the MVP Development LOB — same team, no re-scope, no renegotiation theater. Builds the MVP scoped in Phase 8 against use cases validated in Phases 2 and 6.
This is where real infrastructure lands on your side. The MVP deploys into a sponsor-owned cloud account (AWS / GCP / Azure) or OSS stack on sponsor-provisioned hardware. Source control (GitHub or GitLab) under an org you own. CI/CD pipelines under an org you own. We build; you own. Reference stack options are named in the MVP Scope Spec during Phase 8 — sponsor CIO approves before Week 5 kickoff.
Price and timeline are locked at the Sprint 2 brief once scope is fixed. The price floor is $8,000 USD; complexity, integrations, and regulatory surface area move it up. The 4-week duration is fixed; scope within those weeks flexes.
Sponsor time commitment: ~16 hours across 4 weeks · weekly product reviews.
Cross-cutting planes (bind every phase)
Three systems run across the entire engagement and protect integrity:
Configuration management. Every deliverable references the Founder's Brief, Validation Dossier, and approved Canvas. Week 4 deliverables that contradict Week 1 inputs trigger an exception-resolution step, not silent drift. Vault commits are dated and versioned — sponsor can diff any deliverable against any prior week.
Knowledge management. All research, transcripts, models, and decisions land in the shared vault. At engagement close, sponsor receives a complete export (markdown + attachments + workbook). We retain an archival copy for 12 months under NDA, then delete with a written attestation.
Quality gates / feedback loops. Week 2 Model Approved, Week 3 MVP Scope Decision, Week 4 Delivery. Three formal chances to redirect, pause, or conclude the engagement on evidence.
Integration surfaces
Inbound: idea, evidence collected to date, sponsor calendar for the four engagement windows (Kickoff · Validation readout · Canvas checkpoint · Final), shared folder provisioned by sponsor's IT, transcription-stack consent from sponsor.
Outbound: Business Plan of record · 33 deliverables · editable financial workbook · GTM playbook · optional MVP Scope Spec for direct handoff to Sprint 2 deliverers · complete vault export (markdown + attachments).
Risk signaling: when a phase surfaces a finding that invalidates a core assumption — addressable market smaller than believed, regulatory path blocked, unit economics negative — the gate protocol activates. We pause continuation pending sponsor decision; the finding is captured in the vault with the evidence chain attached.
Business cases
The methodology has been executed against regulated and unregulated industries. Common sponsor patterns:
- Fintech pre-seed. SMB credit product targeting Mexican SMEs. Regulatory path: CNBV registration, ITF concession if applicable. Output supports SOFOM ENR or ITF application. Public-data stack: INEGI + Banxico + Buró de Crédito published stats.
- Healthcare platform. Specialty telemedicine (e.g., cardiology follow-up). Regulatory path: COFEPRIS + NOM-024. Output supports institutional partnerships and compliance planning. Public-data stack: INEGI + IMSS published stats + peer-reviewed literature under fair use.
- Retail / D2C expansion. Omnichannel marketplace entry (Mercado Libre, Amazon MX, direct). Output supports unit-economics validation before inventory commitment. Public-data stack: AMVO reports + Mercado Libre / Amazon MX public category data.
Adjacent fits: proptech, edtech, manufacturing services, B2B SaaS at seed, second-generation family-business ventures.
What this engagement is NOT
This section exists to prevent sponsor mismatch.
- Not RAG. The Business Plan does not answer questions; it is the answer. For corpus-grounded Q&A, see the RAG architecture.
- Not agentic. We do not ship autonomous agents during Sprint 1. For action-taking systems, see the Agentic architecture.
- Not market research. Research is an input to Phase 6. Output is a full operations plan.
- Not a pitch-deck polish service. Decks are symptoms. We deliver the underlying business case that produces the deck — and we deliver it as regeneratable source (markdown + Pandoc), not a Keynote file that dies on a laptop.
- Not ongoing advisory. Engagements close at Week 4 or Week 8. Long-term advisory is a different commercial shape and out of scope for this LOB.
- Not a SaaS you have to integrate. No new tooling lands on sponsor infra during Sprint 1. Sprint 2 brings the MVP Development stack into your environment — see that LOB's architecture page for its deployment footprint.
Latency & cost envelope
| Engagement | Duration | Sponsor hours | Price | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intake | 3–5 days | ~4 | Included | Sprint 1 brief |
| Sprint 1 · Business Plan | 4 weeks | ~32 | $8,000 USD | 33 deliverables |
| Sprint 2 · MVP Build (opt.) | 4 weeks | ~16 | $8,000+ USD | Deployed MVP on sponsor infra |
Payment: 50% at kickoff / 50% at midpoint of each sprint. Sprint 2 price floor is firm; ceiling is scope-dependent and locked at the Sprint 2 brief.
Compute / SaaS cost to sponsor during Sprint 1: $0 incremental. We carry our own seats for Zoom, Otter/Whisper, Miro, Drive. Sponsor's only spend is staff time.
Compute / SaaS cost to sponsor during Sprint 2: variable by MVP shape — sized in the Sprint 2 brief. Reference range: $150–$1,500/month during Sprint 2 for an SMB MVP on a major cloud (small database + small app service + object storage + CI minutes), scaling with usage thereafter.
Reference anchor: the relevant comparator is not other consulting engagements. It is the cost of pitching an unvalidated plan and recovering from a rejection — or worse, building the wrong MVP and deprecating it six months in. Sprint 1 exists to move that failure from the investor's conference room or the production incident review into a Week 2 or Week 3 gate where it can still be corrected cheaply.
Posture note
This methodology is opinionated. Each gate, deliverable, tooling choice, and sequencing decision above corresponds to a documented failure mode we've watched kill seed-stage ventures: unvalidated assumptions, scope drift, founder burn, vendor lock-in on methodology, deliverables as dead PDFs, MVP infrastructure that outlives its usefulness because it was never sponsor-owned.
Where your regulatory environment, industry, or organizational context does not map exactly to the 10-phase shape, the engagements tolerate adaptation — rename phases, add compliance lanes, expand a cluster, swap the transcription stack for one your security office already approves. The un-negotiable elements are the three gates, the founder-time budget, and the rule that everything we deliver is regeneratable from source you own. Everything else adjusts.
For engagement scheduling: Growgy runs the calendar. For methodology adaptation to your specific domain and Sprint 2 stack selection: Teky runs the technical scoping. Both conversations open with the Intake workshop, not a pre-sales questionnaire.
Tech Stack
| Element | Discover · Phases 1–2 Options |
|---|---|
| Phases covered | Phase 1 — Kickoff & Discovery · Phase 2 — Validation Interviews |
| Weeks | Week 1 (Days 1–7) |
| Founder involvement | ~12 hrs — Day-1 2-hr kickoff workshop (Zoom/Meet) + founder-led validation interviews across the week |
| Deliverables | Founder's Brief · Validation Dossier (8–12 PII-scrubbed transcripts + coded pain-patterns) · initial segment map — 6 deliverables cumulative |
| Quality gate | Validation Dossier lands a continue / pivot / stop recommendation · primary segment identified · clear differentiator vs status quo |
| Owner (di-factory) | Primary Consultant (lead) · Analyst & Research (interview capture, transcription, coding) · MVP Liaison (workshop scheduling) |
| Handoff to Model | Raw validated customer insight → foundation for brand, model, and unit economics in the next cluster |
| Element | Model · Phases 3–5 Options |
|---|---|
| Phases covered | Phase 3 — Brand & Narrative · Phase 4 — Business Model Canvas · Phase 5 — Revenue & Unit Economics |
| Weeks | Week 2 (Days 8–14) |
| Founder involvement | ~8 hrs — brand review + Osterwalder canvas session + unit-economics driver-block review |
| Deliverables | Brand Spine · Business Model Canvas v1 (assumptions flagged) · Unit Economics Sheet (pricing · CAC · LTV · break-even) — 14 deliverables cumulative |
| Quality gate | Week 2 gate — Model Approved. Canvas populated against validated inputs · ≥1 assumption validated by interview · sponsor signs or redirects |
| Owner (di-factory) | Primary Consultant (lead) · Analyst & Research (canvas + market inputs) |
| Handoff to Validate | Approved model → ready for market sizing and competitive stress-test in the next cluster |
| Element | Validate · Phases 6–7 Options |
|---|---|
| Phases covered | Phase 6 — Market Sizing & TAM · Phase 7 — Competitive Landscape |
| Weeks | Week 3 (Days 15–21) |
| Founder involvement | ~6 hrs — market-sizing review + competitive review + assumption validation |
| Deliverables | Market Sizing Memo (TAM/SAM/SOM, bottom-up + top-down, every figure cited with retrieval date) · Competitive Canvas (direct/indirect/potential + whitespace) — 24 deliverables cumulative |
| Quality gate | Week 3 gate — MVP Scope Decision (GO / NO-GO on Sprint 2). TAM cross-checked two ways · SOM defensible in year 1 · ≥3 clear differentiators |
| Owner (di-factory) | Primary Consultant (lead) · Analyst & Research (sizing, sources, competitive benchmark) |
| Handoff to Strategize | Validated market context → foundation for GTM, ops plan, and MVP scope in the next cluster |
| Element | Strategize · Phase 8 Options |
|---|---|
| Phases covered | Phase 8 — Go-to-Market & Ops Plan |
| Weeks | Week 4 (Days 22–24) |
| Founder involvement | part of ~6 hrs W4 — GTM/ops working session |
| Deliverables | GTM Playbook (channels · first-100 · ops model · hiring · vendor strategy · regulatory path if applicable — CNBV/COFEPRIS/IFT by industry) · optional MVP Scope Spec (markdown + ADR-lite decision log) if the Week-3 gate was GO |
| Quality gate | GTM plan complete · if GO, MVP scope ≤5 use cases, each traceable to prior evidence (interviews / canvas) |
| Owner (di-factory) | Primary Consultant (lead) · MVP Liaison (scope spec, Sprint-2 readiness) |
| Handoff to Plan | GTM + optional MVP Scope Spec → integrated into the Business Plan of record in the final cluster |
| Element | Plan · Phases 9–10 Options |
|---|---|
| Phases covered | Phase 9 — Business Plan Draft & Financial Model · Phase 10 — Final Delivery |
| Weeks | Week 4 (Days 25–28) + final delivery |
| Founder involvement | part of ~6 hrs W4 — business-plan walkthrough + final sign-off |
| Deliverables | 16-section Business Plan v1 (Markdown → Pandoc → PDF/DOCX) · Financial Model Workbook (editable, cross-referenced) · Final Business Plan + full vault export (no lock-in, no watermarked PDFs) · GO/NO-GO recommendation for Sprint 2 — 33 deliverables cumulative |
| Quality gate | Week 4 gate — Final Delivery. All 16 sections populated · every financial number traceable to a prior phase · recommendation signed off with evidence |
| Owner (di-factory) | Primary Consultant (lead + final recommendation) · Analyst & Research (compilation, cross-references) |
| Handoff to Sprint 2 / client | If GO → MVP Development LOB receives the MVP Scope Spec (from Phase 8) to start Sprint 2 on Day 29. If NO-GO → client keeps a clear map + full source export, no open commitments. |
Use Cases
Pre-seed fintech · SMB credit product
Problem
Founder with 15 years in corporate banking wants to launch a fintech offering revolving credit to Mexican SMBs. Has the thesis but doesn't know if CAC × LTV closes, how to pass CNBV, or whether the primary segment (retail or services) is the right one.
Solution
Full Sprint 1 with emphasis on Phase 8 (Regulatory Checkpoint CNBV — ITF vs SOFOM ENR), unit economics validated in Phase 5 with 12 SMB-owner interviews across both segments, and competitive matrix against Konfío/Kueski/Aviva.
Digital health · Specialty telemedicine platform
Problem
Established cardiologist wants to launch a telemedicine platform for second opinions. Has anecdotal demand but doesn't know whether B2C (patient pays direct) or B2B2C (through insurers) is the right model, nor how to size the TAM in Mexico.
Solution
Sprint 1 with emphasis on Phase 6 (Market Sizing & TAM, crossing 2M cardio patients × avg ticket × smartphone penetration) and Phase 8 (Regulatory Checkpoint COFEPRIS + NOM-024 for electronic medical record). 10 interviews split: 6 patients + 4 insurer medical directors.
Omnichannel retail · D2C brand expanding to Amazon/MELI
Problem
Mexican D2C skincare brand with $8M MXN annual sales on Shopify wants to expand to Amazon MX + MELI + physical retail. Doesn't know if margins survive marketplace commissions, how to prioritize the 3 channels, or what tech stack supports multi-channel operations.
Solution
Sprint 1 with emphasis on Phase 5 (Unit Economics per channel: commission + storage + returns × avg ticket) and Phase 8 (MVP Scope Spec, OMS + PIM + SAT tax integration). 10 interviews split: 4 current customers + 3 marketplace buyers + 3 physical retail owners.
Upskilling platform for a corporate-trainer founder
Problem
A corporate L&D leader wants to productize their sales-training methodology into a B2B platform. Demand signals exist, but there's no pricing model, no unit economics, and no read on per-seat SaaS versus cohort programs.
Solution
A 10-phase sprint ($8K, 4 weeks): validate the B2B buyer and willingness-to-pay across ≥10 interviews · model per-seat versus cohort economics · size the MX corporate-training TAM · close with a GO/NO-GO and a 16-section plan.
Ready to implement this architecture?
Let's discuss how to adapt this blueprint to your business case.
Schedule consultation